Cutting Up The Credit Card

A few weeks ago, we looked at the national debt and deemed it fixable in . To recap, a $100K debt is a problem for most families, but not to Bill Gates, or even Rush Limbaugh. The wealth of the United States can balance that debt with a little creative thinking. We covered it in Is America Broke?

We had a bigger concern over the deficit - our national credit card, which is how we ran up all of that debt. Imagine your teenager managed to take your credit card and maxed it out. Let's even give him some good motivations - some of it was on pizzas and video games, but some was also gifts to friends, and a lot was to help out friends who needed a few bucks. As parents, do you raise the credit limit on the card and hand it back to him? No. If you were to do what most parents do, you would take away the credit card and set him to work paying the debt off.

You do that because raising the credit limit does not teach your teenager how to be responsible with money, and to live within his means. You do that to teach that credit is to be used only in an emergency only, not as a lifestyle choice. You do that because you understand that you cannot spend more than you take in for very long. It's time to take away the national credit card. The conversation that Joe the Biden said went on at every dinner table in America, needs to happen at the national dinner table. Enough is enough.

Now before you accuse us of publishing another piece bashing Obama, we absolutely acknowledge that the spending spree started under George Jr. Sometimes you have to start a war by running a debt. The Taliban and Al Qaeda needed their butts kicked, and we needed to do it. We'll even give you that Saddam needed to be taken down. We did not need to launch two full scale wars complete with a side of nation building. We certainly did not need to put it on the card. You have to give his dad kudos for Gulf War 1 - we fought it, but the Saudis paid for it.

While we're at it George Jr tried to bring up entitlement reform in 2006. That's the same thing we are tossing around now. Medicare and Social Security were going to go bankrupt. Well, George Jr got his behind handed to him, and to apologize he gave us a tidy new prescription drug benefit. Put it on the card.

Then their was TARP. Let's get a cash advance off the card and give it to banks who behaved badly - no strings attached. Now granted they behaved badly because of policies promoted by the Clinton Administration, but it was on his watch. When Junior entered 2008, the national deficit was between $485 billion and $600 billion, depending on whose numbers you use. The national debt sat at $9.849 trillion, of which he inherited $5.727 trillion from the Bill Clinton (yes, Virginia - Bubba had a balanced budget, but we did owe money).

Enter Obama, and in the world of good intentions we get the "Stimulus" ( Slumdog Billionaire: The Stimulus Plan  ). $787 billion on the card. Then there was Obamacare with the magic "almost" $1 trillion - again, on the card. 99 weeks of unemployment - charge it. Auto bailouts - ah the Chinese are good for it. New wars in Pakistan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia. Put 'em on the card. And have Bernake print up $1.6 trillion for pocket change. As of today the deficit is running at $1.6 - 1.8 trillion (again, depending on whose numbers you use), and the debt is breaking through it's $14 trillion dollar ceiling.

In this one area, Obama has outperformed Junior by more than double. He has accomplished more in 3 years than Bush did in eight. And we get the bill. Nice.

So what is the answer? What is it for your teenager? The debt we dealt with - hold a garage sale. We can pay it. Do we hand the credit card back, with a raised credit limit? Not only do we not raise the limit, we need to cut up the credit card. We need to issue the federal government a debit card.

Using current tax rates, we can come up with a dollar figure. That is the amount of incoming tax dollars, which is applied to the debit card. When the card runs dry, the government is out of money. Period. No borrowing the credit card anymore. We are talking the long sought Balanced Budget Amendment that goes back to Thomas Jefferson in 1798 ( and yes, we are aware of the Louisiana Purchase. There are exceptions to every rule. Anyone want to give it back?)  The Feds will need to prioritize their spending, and maybe show some discipline. They will need to see if there's enough cash before they spend it. We tend to think that will cut back on much of the idiocy that is government subsidized.

It will absolutely require a reworking of Social Security and Medicare. The Ponzi pyramid is reversed now with less paying in to support more. It is unsustainable. It is unsustainable because it has become what it is not. Social Security was not designed to be a retirement fund. It was meant to be a supplement, not a replacement for retirement savings.See Social Insecurity

What about our "commitments" to the poor, schools, farmers, etc? There is a strong argument that the federal government should not be involved in any of these things, however we are. It is the job of the congress to prioritize expenses, and to provide funding. If we have to do these things, provide the money to the individual states as a fixed block grant, and let the states decide how best to make use of it. No automatic increases in the grants every year. The states, who are supposed to be the ultimate judges of what their people need under our Constitution, can decide that for themselves.

How about getting more money? Sure, but not by raising taxes - instead by creating new taxpayers. It worked for Reagan, and it worked for Clinton. Even George Junior until the housing crash (His unemployment numbers up to June 2008 were about 5%) . Those Administrations got out of the way of the economy to a large degree, and the economy prospered. People went back to work. More people were paying taxes. The tax coffers swelled. Look at that - more money to work with - to PAY OFF THE DEBT.

We at TPP side with those who would take the credit card away. The Congress is less responsible with it than we could expect our teens to be. Will that happen? We don't know. Boehner has been snookered at least twice and we're not sure of his spine. The Gang of Six proposal is another "trust me" proposition. There is no plan there, just a commitment to an idea about a plan (please, Dad, I promise not to do it again). We said in the national debt article that the deficit would require the adults to step up and take care of it. The adults are us, and it's time to take away the credit card. So says Common Sense.

RLB

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 7/21/2011 8:46 PM Ron Mortinson wrote:
    I'll try to make a Crazy long economic exercise very short.. Pretend we decided to most people to work to work really hard and pay off the National Debt. We would pay back China, Japan, S.Korea, France, Germany, right down to all our own people. Sooner or later, we get to the debt (Treasury Bill's) actually owned by the Federal Reserve. Afterall, we see how in QE1 and QE2, The US Tresury print's T-bill's, and The Federal Reserve print's dollar's, and the Tresury and the Federal Reserve exchange Billion's in T-bill's for Billion's of Freshly printed Dollar's... And when the Tresury makes interest payment's on T-Bill's owned by the Federal Reserve, The Fed generally loan's those dollar's right back to Tresury.... So if we are actually paying of the debt, we will hit the point where the Federal Reserve is the only place still holding US debt. I first good question is how much US debt does the Federal Reserve really own, I would guess that number to be maybe 3 or 4 trillion?! we don't know because they keep there book's secret, But when it comes to paying off that debt, do the folk's that voted to create the currency get it back?(Greenspan, and more so,Bernanke?); do the printing press operator's get a cut of those Trillion's?, How about the Forest Product's companies that made the paper and the ink companies that made the ink that created the new currency, Do these folk's get a cut of the Trillion's being paid back? When it comes down to paying off that last portion of the National Debt, Who is it that actually get's paid back? My point is that when currency is freshly printed and created, this process De-Values the currency we all hold, so what isthe true solution to re-valueing the currency we hold that HAS BEEN De-Valued? The quest to find answer's to this/these question' clearly does create more question's that answer's,,,, And I think the complexity of the problem Maximizes the need to begin answering/solving the related problem's! It should start with getting regulation out of the way and putting Million's of people back to work... Those additional tax payer's can make a difference to the Federal bottom line in such a way that some day, maybe we really can have to worry about the problem of who get's paid back when the Federal Reserve is the only place we owe National debt money back to!
    Reply to this
  • 7/22/2011 1:54 PM modoman wrote:
    Ron, that was a long journey but I think I get your point. I agree with the assessment of the author in his article on the national debt last month - that the debt itself isn't the problem. We can fund that in ways other than the taxes we have collected on us. The problem is the process - the debt keeps going up because we spend more than we take in. No one is in any shape to pay more taxes right now, so the alternative is to cut spending. A sto who holds the debt, you're right - no one knows because the Federal Reserve doesn't tell us. That's a prescription for trouble, and needs to be dealt with directly.
    Reply to this
  • 7/22/2011 1:58 PM crackerjack wrote:
    Cut, Cap and Balance fixes the whole problem. It's s shame Harry Reid tabled it after the Hose approved it. It is supported by 70% of voters according to Zogby.
    Reply to this
  • 7/22/2011 2:53 PM Ron wrote:
    Amen to That
    Reply to this
  • 7/22/2011 4:17 PM janis wrote:
    Boehner may screw this up yet. All this fanfare for walking out of the budget talks, and he trips over himself revealing that he had agreed to $800 billion in revenue enhancements. Isn't that just a fancy way of saying tax hikes?
    Reply to this
  • 7/22/2011 4:19 PM crackerjack wrote:
    Just when I thought he might have grown a set. Why is it that only Republican women have cojones?
    Reply to this
  • 7/24/2011 8:23 AM bagorocks wrote:
    So now we have Boehner and McConnell colluding with Harry Reid? I don't see how this can work out well.
    Reply to this
  • 7/24/2011 2:40 PM Ron Mortinson wrote:
    They will wait til the last minute and then just sort of toss the warm smelly stuff into the fan!
    Reply to this
  • 7/25/2011 7:53 AM modoman wrote:
    Last info I have is that there are two bills moving forward - one Republican and one Dem. The timelines on implementation are different, but neither one is calling for any tax increases. I guess that Reid really is PO'd at Obama. The Dem plan really slaps him in the face.
    Reply to this
  • 7/25/2011 2:51 PM largelife wrote:
    There's something funny going on. Obama canceled his press conference, and then rescheduled it to couple hours later with Boehner to follow. I can hope, butthere's not a good track record here. This is right on track as far as Obama spending money like a teenager. Congress needs to discipline him.
    Reply to this
  • 7/27/2011 8:20 PM valerie wrote:
    Typical - protect the rich on the backs ofthe poor. Youguys should be ashamed.
    Reply to this
  • 8/2/2011 7:48 AM Marcus wrote:
    Never had 1 to cut up :o) never understood the fact of paying all that MONTHLY Interest and the person you purchase from coughing up 10% for them to use it in your business .... Legalized Loan Sharks to me :o)
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.