A Grinch For All Seasons

During the season of Christmas, the stories of Santa, Scrooge and the Grinch all speak of the joy of giving as well as of receiving. It spills into every area of our lives. At the door of every merchant clamoring for your holiday dollars, is a person with a bell and a red kettle looking for the leftovers. Our Christmas cards are mixed in with appeals from every possible charity. Our Marines collect Toys For Tots. The plight of the poor gets it's annual spin through the news cycle. We get to feel bad for them, but good that it's not us - except that maybe this year it is us.

We tend to see the Democrats as Santa Claus, giving gifts freely to anyone on the nice list, and distributing lumps of coal to the naughty children. They want to help the poor and the downtrodden. They make gifts magically appear after a midnight sleigh ride through the Capitol. They believe that no one should suffer - except maybe those disappointed naughty children.

Unfortunately the Democrats have the same problems as Santa Claus. There are no magic flying reindeer. He makes no midnight ride. He doesn't have a bunch of elves making i-pods and Barbies at the North Pole. They are made by underpaid workers in China, and shipped to Walmart for our consumption. Santa is real parents spending real money on these gifts, and spending the time carefully wrapping them in order to keep the illusion alive.

In the same way, the Democrat goodie bag is nothing more than an illusion. Every goodie bestowed to those on the nice list has to be paid for. In this case the parents preserving the illusion are the taxpayers who foot the bill for the Santa's gift list. Wouldn't it be nice if the government could solve all of our problems? Wouldn't it be nice if a fat man in a red suit gave us cool stuff after breaking into our homes? 

The Republican stereotype is Scrooge, the king of the naughty list - greedy, miserly, cold and uncaring. He has an amazing talent for turning his lumps of coal into diamonds. His change of heart only comes about after being reminded, educated and threatened by three ghostly apparitions (Democrats, we assume...). Suddenly he is transformed (hmmmm... that sounds familiar) into the most generous of souls. He feeds the poor, treats the sick, and gives Bob Crachit a raise.

Unlike Santa Claus, Scrooge provides this generosity out of his own money. He uses the money that he has earned to provide charity that he deems necessary. Sort of like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett creating charitable foundations. And why do they form these foundations? It's not a vote of confidence in Santa. If they thought that the government was handling these issues effectively through tax dollars, they would just give Santa a few extra billion and not take on the headache of watching where the dollars go.

We find the most compelling character to be the Grinch .He wants to be left alone without the rest of the world intruding. He is not consumed with the gifts, per se, but in the noise of the celebration that he sees intruding on his own way of life. He sees the theft of the Christmas gifts as a way to preserve his own way of life. He is not harassed into a change of spirit by forces outside of his own conscience. When he understands that he is wrong, he chooses to do right. His morphing is one of self-awareness. He learns that he was mistaken in his views, and in his actions. He corrects them. 

The Grinch did not buy little trinkets for the Whos like Santa. He did not throw money at them like Scrooge to ease his guilt. All he did was to give the Whos in Whoville their stuff back. If only we could get the Congress to do the same for us.  Then the Grinch took a place at the table with the Whos.

The Whos are us. They go about their lives, enjoy their families and their traditions and we assume, pay their Who taxes. It was their example that caused the Grinch to do the right thing. The honorable thing. He chose to better himself.

The Grinch came to understand what our Santas and Scrooges do not. The Whos were not upset at the loss of the gifts and decorations, because their focus was not on the trappings - it was on the substance, family and friends. They had faith in their traditions and community. They were grounded. No matter if there are gifts or decorations, we have people to rely on among our friends and family.

This year has many people facing adversity, and to many it's more serious than not having gifts. Unemployment is high, houses are still being lost. People are trying to make due with much less - even people who thought their finances were secure. Many heads of household are under enormous pressure. Those who remained grounded will get through these bad times. Those who cannot will suffer. Some will snap. Some will be broken.

America as a society seems to be on the cusp of a Grinch moment. As we look around, we see that things have changed, and not for the good. It goes beyond a sour economy and right to the heart of our American spirit. More people than ever are dependent on government assistance, and it bothers us.  The generational poverty that has dogged the inner cities and rural areas is staking claim in the suburbs. Ever growing numbers are joining the ranks of those whose finances AND spirits are broken. They wait for Santa and a winning lottery ticket..

The Santas profess to care and hand out aid by the bucket load - however Santa is not able to deliver dignity wrapped up in pretty paper or legislation. The Scrooges see that no matter how much money we spend to fix the plight of the suffering, it will do nothing if the individual is unwilling or unable to use temporary aid to effect permanent improvement in their situation. The Grinch remained a bitter creature until he decided not to be. In the end it is up to the individual.

Common Sense Dictates

Americans are upset this year, as we were last year. We are bitter that our perceived riches have vanished. We may be tempted to make poor choices or wallow in our bad fortune. We can do that. We can join the other angry grinches and opt for the mentality that the government owes us, that it's impossible to dig our way out. We can give up and become wards of the state.

Or we can do as our one Grinch did. We can realize that our plan didn't work out. We can change the plan. That means different things for different people - there is no one size fits all solution. For some it may be returning to school or learning a new trade. For others it may be to start a new business, or to move to a new area. For a few it might be going to family and friends and riding out the storm. Through it all, we can continue to do the right thing and move forward.

As we go about our holiday bustle, we should take the time to count our blessings - our permanent joys even in difficult times. For those who can, drop a few dollars, or even a few coins in the red kettle. It was the example of the Whos that inspired the Grinch. We never know when a small gesture can save a life. If you have the ability to do more, consider it. In this economy, it's not just the homeless that are helped, it may be neighbors.

The Grinch provides us an inspiring illustration of how to use what we can control - our attitudes and actions; to cope with what we cannot control - which is much of life. We should embrace our inner Grinch, and follow his honorable example in all seasons. So says Common Sense.

RLB





 

  

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 12/18/2010 11:55 AM modoman wrote:
    Well this takes Dr. Seuss to a whole new level. So is Obama in the process of "embracing his inner Grinch?" - or will it be Boehner?
    Reply to this
  • 12/18/2010 5:27 PM steinway wrote:
    While you're focused on Santa and the Grinch, remember, Jesus is the reason for the season.
    Reply to this
  • 12/19/2010 7:29 AM crackerjack wrote:
    Looks like Scrooge slapped Santa good this week. Maybe that grinch Obama will have a change of heart and start to better himself.
    Reply to this
  • 12/19/2010 7:35 AM Karen wrote:
    I don't think it does any good to promote stereotypes. It's not like the Democrats are just giving stuff away. The Republicans had to have their tax cut for the rich.You reference to the grinch is offensive. It implies that people who are hurting in this economy choose to stay that way. That's ridiculous. Looks like you are the one who needs to improve himself.
    Reply to this
  • 12/19/2010 9:09 AM bagorocks wrote:
    Democrats can't possibly be Santa. I've never met one who was jolly. Karen is a good example of that. Laugh once in awhile. Draw some inspiration. All that is said is that our attitude has a lot to do with how things turn out.
    Reply to this
  • 12/20/2010 2:00 PM madhatr wrote:
    Ok, so they are the Billy Bob Thornton kind, but they keep giving stuff away to their favorites. This time it's at the expense of the military. Here's a logistical nightmare - where do you house gay soldiers. You can bunk straight men with straight men and not have to worry about fraternization. Ditto straight women. If you do a gay dorm the temptation will be there to engage in sex, just as if the gay man was among straights. You can't fight biology. The first one who steps over the line (that's human nature, someone will) and gets the crap beat out of him will be the start of a wave. Especially when the soldier who beat him up will be prosecuted for a hate crime. This is a bad idea.
    Reply to this
  • 12/21/2010 1:02 PM ekrassner wrote:
    It would be the greatest holiday (no offense, I celebrate Hannukah) gift for Obama to make a grinch transformation. the shame is that is as likely to happen as St Nick showing up at my house. If nothing else he is proving to be still pushing his agenda while he can. The only reason he didn't win on the tax bill was enough Democrats decided that they like their job better than they like Obama. The lame duck has nothing to lose, and Obama wants what he wants. January can't get here soon enough.
    Reply to this
  • 12/21/2010 6:49 PM john wrote:
    No One in Washington is going to have a grinch moment. That's for us to do - the ones who haven't anyway. We can sit and complain, or we can do the work necessary to make our lives better. The only way to change society is to replace it one person at a time. Sometimes it's by force, and sometimes it's by will.
    Reply to this
  • 12/22/2010 2:54 PM n turner wrote:
    That would be the point. If we look for change from an outside source, we are prone to disappointment. It is up to us as individuals to display the values that we want others to adopt, to speak by our actions. This would be an excellent gift to the Savior whose birth we celebrate, and who is the true living example of this principle.
    Reply to this
  • 12/22/2010 3:21 PM largelife wrote:
    All we're talking is taking personal responsibility. If everyone who could do that would do it, a lot of the problems we have would go away. It's why immigrants coming here from horrible conditions do better than our own citizens who were raised on welfare. Of course there should be temporary aid for emergencies, but it shouldn't be a lifestylechoice.
    Reply to this
  • 12/22/2010 4:02 PM dunston wrote:
    Just because you are on assistance doesn't make it a lifestyle. My wife has been out of work since just after the crash. I'm working as much overtime as I can get in a good paying job, and it's that plus the unemployment that keeps us and the kids in our home and fed - barely. You might not hve noticed but the economy is in the crapper. There are no jobs. We have taken responsibility and it comes up short. I don't like it, but thank God for that unemployment check. How about we get some jobs created? Then we won't need the dirty government money.
    Reply to this
  • 12/23/2010 12:42 PM Gene wrote:
    I don't think that anyone faults people on unemployment. It's there and you have to feed your family. You choosing to work overtime and take the unemployment for your wife isn't a lifestyle. She obviously would rather be working. I think that by lifestyle, it's people wo can work the system well enough that they can just live off of public assistance and not bother to work. They are out there, and I object to paying someone out of my tax dollars to sit on their behind and watch TV for a living. That was the good part about welfare reform in the 90s. People were brought out of poverty, who had been lifelong dependent on the government. Now you have Obama changing the welfare rules back, and not creating any jobs. It's just making things worse.
    Reply to this
  • 12/23/2010 2:52 PM ragman wrote:
    While we're at it, the people coming to America just for the benefits...
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.