Swan Song For Lame Ducks
The lame ducks are back. Queen Nancy is in the waning days of her power, and Prince Harry is still licking his wounds. There are serious issues that need to be dealt with, but somehow, first and foremost, the ethics hearing of Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is topping the list of must do's in DC. Substitute the serious mood music of deliberation on issues of vital importance with the chase music from "The Benny Hill Show". You can take the legislature out of clown college, but it seems you can't remove the clowns from the legislature.
This is not to minimize the charges of ethics breaches filed against Mr. Rangel. They are numerous and pretty glaring - everything from profiteering on several rent-controlled apartments in NYC, to forgetting to report income on some vacation property in the Caribbean. Lots in between as well.
It would be hard for anyone to accept Mr.Rangel's contention that he "did nothing wrong". Reasonable conclusions are either that he plays fast and loose with the truth, or that he's just not all that smart. Neither condition looks well on a Congressman. Still, do we really need to waste time on THIS, now? Charlie Rangel has been playing NYC machine politics for 50 years. It's every bit as dirty as Chicago politics. We have a 4 week window in this lame duck session, and these charges have been floating around for years. Congress has more important things to do.
We have no federal budget. The tax cuts are due to expire. The economy is still in the toilet. Unemployment is still at intolerable levels. The new START Treaty has been gathering dust since February. These are the things that Congress needs to be working on immediately, not providing punch lines for Jon Stewart .
Here's your "To Do" list, Nancy and Harry-
Pass the Budget - nothing inspires confidence in all of those countries that we owe money to (China, Japan, Korea, India) like not being able to set a budget (wait... India, really? Giving US money to waste? How the times have changed...). We are starting to look like Greece - kicking the can down the road. A series of Continuing Resolutions (authorizing money on a periodic basis to keep things functioning) is no substitute for a plan. The current resolution expires in December. Congress has very few stated functions in the Constitution. Setting a budget is one of them. If it's not too much trouble could you guys do your actual job?
Extend the Tax Cuts - for everyone. This will address a whole bunch of other problems at the same time. Right now businesses are putting off hiring, and consumers are putting off major purchases because no one knows what sort of a bite the federal government will be taking out of our wallet's come January 1. Businesses and families invest money and spend money based on a budget. Without knowing how much is coming in there is no way to figure out what can be spent. We know that the Congress is woefully inept at understanding the concept of a budget, but it's the world that the rest of us live in. Extend the Tax Cuts - even better, make them permanent. Then watch for some of those "green shoots" to sprout out of the dead economy.
The new Start Treaty - act on it. That's another one of those jobs given to the Congress by the Constitution - ratifying treaties. One more time - do your job. TPP did a study on this new treaty addressing nuclear weapons between the US and Russia. You can get more details at: A Good Start
All-in-all we find it to be a good agreement. Our only serious concern lies in limiting so-called "delivery systems" which are not exclusively used for nuclear weapons. TPP feels that provision needs modification. Doing so falls under the jurisdiction of the Senate. With that done, we see no reason to put off passage.
That's it - 3 things and then you can go home. Please. Everything else can wait for the new term that starts in January. Or if you just want to hang out in DC for awhile, once you finish these tasks go back and clean up the sullied reputation of the House by spanking Charlie Rangel. Plucking out one swamp creature should do wonders for the approval rating of Congress.
TPP did have a concern that the Democrat leadership would try to give one more push to the Obama agenda. With the lead off event of the lame duck session being the Rangel hearing, we have had our concern minimized. Clearly, the leadership does not possess the ability to prioritize the importance of what it could be spending it's time doing. Rather than a push for immigration reform or a new stimulus, we think it more likely that a food fight will break out. That's just as well. If the Congress can manage to focus on the three issues we have listed here, they may be able to claim an actual accomplishment. If nothing else gets worked on, at least no more damage will be done. Common Sense can live with that.
RLB

The Tea Party got their first victory today. McConnell caved on earmarks and now supports a Republican ban on them. Let's hope this is the first of many changes coming.
Reply to this
One more for you - the Defense Appropriations Bill for Afghanistan and Iraq. It's been held up by the clause added in about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell". We need to do what it takes to fund the troops, whether it means passing it as is, or stripping out DADT. There are soldiers in harms way while these guys screw around with social policy.
Reply to this
That was fast. Rangel was convicted of 11 out of the 13 charges before the sub-committee just now. It's off to the full House for sanctions. Expect that later this week. I bet that your glad you got this one published in time.
Reply to this
Just came over the wire - Heath Shuler is mounting a challenge to Nancy Pelosi for Minority Leader. I hope that he's more successful with this than he was in the NFL.
Reply to this
This Congress has a long list of accomplishments - health care, jobs, climate change, and extension of unemployment benefits. This was not a do-nothing Congress.
Reply to this
It's a shame the voters really didn't like any of those accomplishments, Randi. Hey, i read the article on the Start treaty, but I don't want it just pushed through. It might be presented as a good idea by the administration, but so was health care. We didn't see all of the bad news with it shake out for months. Hell, we're still finding out the bad surprises. I,m not saying vote the treaty down. I just want it really carefully examined before it is ratified. The Russians don't play games.
Reply to this
I could live with just getting the budget passed and extending the tax cuts. I'd rather have the new Congress deal with the rest of the issues. I just don't trust these guys.
Reply to this
Here's an idea - if Charlie Rangel can turn a profit on a few crappy apartments in New York, why doesn't the Congress put him in charge of fixing the economy as his punishment. We wouldn't do any worse than anything that's been tried so far. besides, he's fun to listen to.
Reply to this
LMAO!!!!
Reply to this
Everyone is talking "preserve tax cuts". There are no tax cuts. The tax rates we pay now have been on the books for 10 years. They are THE tax rates. Obama is porposing a TAX INCREASE of 4 to 6 percent on most people. Ok, so now he says he'll fold on everyone under $200K ($250K for families). That is a major screw over to most of the small businesses in this country. It might not make a difference to a single person internet business, bt any place that employs 6 or more people is going to get bit by this. We need to be honest. Obama wants to raise tax rates.
Reply to this
I've got some major problems with the START treaty. Besides the delivery systems limits, there are limitations placed on modernization of our existing weapons and large gaps in verification. I agree we need a treaty, but this one is too badly flawed to just pass it without serious modifications.
Reply to this
Modernization isn't really addressed by the treaty. Obama was just dragging his feet on it. He has since pledged $80 billion to update and upgrade our nuclear arsenal toget the Republicans on board. Verification is a non-issue. It depends on the Russians being as honest with us as we are with them. They won't be. We'll still need clandestine services. The delivery systems are a big deal. If we are limited to 1100 nuclear warheads, it really doesn't matter how many ways we have to deliver them. This is really a backdoor way to control our conventional weapon capability. That needs to be changed.
Reply to this
Looks like a little bit of liberal agenda beingrolled out. The DREAM act is back for avote as early as Nov. 29. Itwill never pass the Senate, but Pelosi wants to go down swinging.
Reply to this
Rangel gets a lecture from the Speaker and a censure from the House. Wesley Snipes goes to jail for 3 years for essentially the same thing. I'm glad that the law applies equally to everyone.
Reply to this
Here's another immediate action item - put a short leash on the TSA. It's looking more and more like a police state every day.
Reply to this